|
Title: Trance Vs. House Post by: Thomas Fraser on August 15, 2006, 08:35:22 PM First of all, what is the difference?! I know the kick on every beat, but a lot of trance does that. So, what is the difference?
Next, what do you prefer? House or trance? Title: Re: Trance Vs. House Post by: ikondance on August 23, 2006, 10:21:50 AM I like both
Title: Re: Trance Vs. House Post by: Ikronix on August 24, 2006, 03:13:52 AM Imagine the boundary between trance and house to be a gradient, rather than a solid line. The line is beyond blurry.
However, to make a few generalizations... 1. Trance tends to be mixed in an "orchestral" space. Think about the difference between a recording of an orchestra and a jazz band, in terms of "size" and "space." Trance instruments typically sound more like they've been "recorded" in an orchestral hall, rather than mic'ed up-close. This distinction doesn't really apply to a lot of recent progressive house, though. 2. Following the previous point, trance music conventions tend to be inspired by classical music (and rock power ballads, to be honest), whereas house tends to draw from jazz and funk roots. This is where the line really gets fuzzy, because there's a lot of "classical-sounding" house and "jazzy-sounding" trance. Especially recently. 3. In house, the bassline typically holds more musical focus. There are strong basslines in trance, but it usually sets up more melodic, high-register instruments to make the track what it is. And now watch as everyone immediately disagrees with me. ;) Title: Re: Trance Vs. House Post by: ikondance on August 24, 2006, 03:46:47 AM No i take your point :)
although trance take many guises remember, think of some of the first trance tunes like the early Hearthouse/ Rising high recordings or even Ecstasy Club - Jesus Loves The Acid from 1988, that was a trance tune in my opinion Title: Re: Trance Vs. House Post by: Oneel on August 24, 2006, 05:13:21 PM Ehhhhh....I don't know...The genres really aren't distinguished as much by sound as they are structure.
House---120-130 bpm typically. Kicks on 1 & 3, Claps on 2 & 4 ALWAYS. (NOTE: House has kicks on 2 & 4 as well, but the claps are the focus on those beats.) Trance--135-145 bpm typically. Kicks have an offbeat hat attached. Title: Re: Trance Vs. House Post by: Christopher Carl on August 25, 2006, 02:12:57 AM Talk about blurred lines. I blur the lines between house and trance all the time. I tend to use them interchangably as long as they have a similar vibe. I sort of disagree on the bpm rule that Kevin has presented. While it is technically true, I know of plenty of house tracks that are in the 135+ range.
Title: Re: Trance Vs. House Post by: Oneel on August 25, 2006, 06:07:49 AM The only house I've ever heard over 135 is hard house.
Title: Re: Trance Vs. House Post by: Christopher Carl on August 25, 2006, 06:40:56 AM exactly.
Title: Re: Trance Vs. House Post by: Thomas Fraser on August 26, 2006, 12:05:34 AM And I'm not too sure about the trance having off kicks, and house being on 1 & 2... Most of the trance I hear is on 1 through 4, same with house.
Title: Re: Trance Vs. House Post by: Oneel on August 26, 2006, 01:19:03 AM Nooooo...Trance has an OFFBEAT HIHAT, not an offbeat kick
Title: Re: Trance Vs. House Post by: Thomas Fraser on August 27, 2006, 12:27:59 AM Oops :P I meant off beat hihat.
Whenever I listen to some house though, it just sounds... boring. It has these lame melodies that are really really slow... Title: Re: Trance Vs. House Post by: ikondance on September 04, 2006, 07:16:00 AM This is a ridiculous thread, it makes no difference what is on the off beat!
The lines in dance music are constantly being blurred because that's hopefully what keeps the music moving forward. If we all made music by numbers then it would get boring pretty quickly. Title: Re: Trance Vs. House Post by: Oneel on September 04, 2006, 09:01:05 AM Yeah, it does matter. And it's not music by numbers as much as it is following a basic structure. If you don';t believe me, just go listen to several tracks each of different genres. You'll discover that each genre pretty much follows a similar structure in each track.
Title: Re: Trance Vs. House Post by: ikondance on September 04, 2006, 09:29:11 AM Yeah different styles follow a formula but what I’m saying is it's not set in stone, have a listen to my track 'string of hearts' on my myspace site, what category does that fall into?
Title: Re: Trance Vs. House Post by: Oneel on September 04, 2006, 10:03:49 AM I'd say String of Hearts is definitely techno. No claps, no hats. No organic sounds. Definitely followed a typical Techno structure.
Check out BTU's stuff on AudioJelly.com and let me know what you think about our stuff.. Just go to Audiojelly.com and search btu recordings Title: Re: Trance Vs. House Post by: L8-01 on September 28, 2006, 05:10:30 AM Im a trance kiddy house bores me
Title: Re: Trance Vs. House Post by: Sarah on October 03, 2006, 03:09:55 AM it's all techno to me. :smiley23:
Title: Re: Trance Vs. House Post by: Oneel on October 03, 2006, 08:37:19 AM Spend some time on this site then...
http://www.di.fm/edmguide/edmguide.html Title: Re: Trance Vs. House Post by: Just Drew on October 03, 2006, 10:50:42 AM Spend some time on this site then... http://www.di.fm/edmguide/edmguide.html I've been trying to find this for a friend, thanks. Title: Re: Trance Vs. House Post by: Joel on October 03, 2006, 07:44:02 PM a good way to check the difference is to go to places like beatport and listen to the clips in each genre. though if you go to any of the house genre's and subgenre's a lot of them sound like dirty electro, at least the stuff in the various charts anyway...
Title: Re: Trance Vs. House Post by: Immanuel Thomas on October 03, 2006, 08:33:51 PM it's all techno to me. :smiley23: Shes teasing you guys. She always tells me that too. :smiley8: Title: Re: Trance Vs. House Post by: Joel on October 04, 2006, 08:59:40 AM lol, Terrence Parker is listed in the disco house tab
Title: Re: Trance Vs. House Post by: Davo on October 04, 2006, 08:38:49 PM most simple definition i can think of:
TRANCE is about the melodies HOUSE is about the groove Title: Re: Trance Vs. House Post by: Oneel on October 04, 2006, 08:40:41 PM I swear it's a production formula...Like I stated earlier
Title: Re: Trance Vs. House Post by: Joel on October 05, 2006, 01:14:23 AM i have a hard time agreeing with you on that one.
but house is deffo about the groove, no doubt about it... i think ishkur said it best when describing funky house... when is house not funky? Title: Re: Trance Vs. House Post by: Oneel on October 05, 2006, 01:32:13 AM Oh I won't argue that House is more groove oriented whereas Trance is more melody oriented...But my OCD organizational mind won't allow me to think like that...Oh the torment!
Title: Re: Trance Vs. House Post by: Joel on October 05, 2006, 03:19:34 PM its obviously a more complicated subject and i won't disagree that structure is a big part but i've found if i have to explain genres to someone who is not a dance fanatic, then telling them that house is about the groove makes more sense to them.
Title: Re: Trance Vs. House Post by: Oneel on October 05, 2006, 05:29:37 PM Hehehe....You rock, Joel!
|